About Club History Authors Training Newsletter Current Previous Back Issues Snapshots Events Roster Links Weather Directions Join Us! Members only: Membership Webmail Admin DO Rep's |
. |
President's Prerogative Membership Issues View From the Pawnee's Head The Lull of a False Sense of Security The Color Green There was Wave in Them Thar Hills... "Current" BFRers Log This... Back Issues: | . |
April, 2000 President's Prerogative I'd like to discuss two topics this month. The first has to do with the manner in which the board of directors operates and communicates with the membership at large; the second pertains to taking the next necessary step toward implementing our Strategic Plan. Our Club is organized as something of a republic. The members elect the directors, who then wield almost all of the power of the Club in terms of allocating resources, setting policy and rules, etc. The board is, if you will, the "judicial" branch of the Club's government. The board in turn delegates some responsibilities to a loosely-knit "executive" branch, which is comprised of the various Officers and Weenies such as the Treasurer, Chief Tow pilot, Chief Flight Instructor, Chief Duty Officer, etc. As time marches on and the Club grows, I think we'll see this executive branch become more formally organized-perhaps even with a leader who is not necessarily a member of the board-and will also begin to take full responsibility for the operational (or tactical) aspects of the Club's activities. The board would then take on a more high-level (or strategic) role. Now that you've suffered through this history lesson, I'll get to my actual point. The board represents you-the Club members-in its deliberations. If there is a mismatch between what the members want and what the board does, then the system ain't working right. The most significant contributor to these mismatches is a simple lack of communication. If you as a member want the board to be aware of an issue, then please direct that issue to the attention of the directors. We have a special e-mail address: skyline-directors@www.ssl.umd.edu. The discussions that go on via the skyline-members mailing list are excellent, but that forum is one where many disparate issues and ideas are tossed around for general comment and discourse; it's sometimes difficult to distinguish between informal brainstorming and items which require specific board action. Director's meetings are, in general, open to the membership. (We sometimes close the meeting when discussing matters than pertain to an individual member.) If you feel strongly about a particular issue, or simply enjoy watching sausage being made, you are invited to attend. Our next meeting is on June 3. Advance notice is requested if you'd like your issue to be added to the agenda; "walk-ons" have, regrettably, sometimes not been heard because of time limitations and full agendas. We are also trying to do a much better job of communicating key board decisions to the membership. You'll be seeing evidence of that in this newsletter, and also through broadcast and targeted e-mail messages to the affected parties. Please help the board represent your wishes; they are there solely to serve you. On to the next topic... Once we have completed the Charter Loan payoffs, we will be ready to take the next step in executing the club's Strategic Plan, namely the expansion of the Club fleet. First in line of acquisitions is a towplane. We have established an Aircraft Acquisition Committee-consisting of Jim Garrison, Shane Neitzey, and Bill Vickland-to monitor the market and recommend specific acquisitions to the Board. Since good aircraft move quickly in this market, it is important that we have the resources (i.e., funds) already in place to be able to respond to good opportunities. So, we are now formally asking members to make commitments toward a fund that would be used for aircraft acquisition. Recognizing that different members have different financial situations, we are asking for individual members to make commitments at a level at which they are comfortable. The terms being offered are money-market rates while the funds are idle, then converting to a loan with 5% interest and a target repayment period of five years using annual payments. Obviously, the repayment period will be a function of the Club's financial condition, but our conservatively-projected surpluses should be adequate to meet the five-year target. We are not setting any particular levels of expected contributions. Members should understand that candidate towplanes run in the neighborhood of $40K; the same is true of two-seat fiberglass training gliders with trailer. The pace at which we are able to expand the Club fleet is largely determined by size of the aircraft acquisition fund, as we have ample evidence that the Pawnee and at least one of our two-seat gliders are already oversubscribed. If the majority of members are able to commit somewhere between $1,000 and $2,000 each, then we will be able to purchase the towplane and possibly the two-seat glider this year. If this amount is too large (or too small) for your particular budget, please do not be put off from making a contribution. Contributions of any size are welcome. Please discuss this with your spouse and/or other financial advisor(s). We are ready to begin building the fund immediately. We will not make any aircraft acquisitions until the Charter Loans are paid off, so expect the real need date to be sometime after late April. This is an exciting time to be a member of our Club. I look forward to the next few months with hope and optimism, and can't wait for the new machine(s) to start showing up! See you at the field.
Membership Issues
Any questions, concerns, comments or gripes on this, don't
hesitate to contact me.
View from Pawnee's Head
The Lull of a False Sense of Security
Date; 03-19-00. Now after 22 years, almost 2,200 aero tows and a number of rope rejections, I was lulled into a false sense of security. Yep, there I was in the back seat of the K giving John Lewis his spring field check. Rope looked good to me. Good right cross wind on 09 at FRR. I am sitting comfortably at 300 to 400' then, "POW"-we turn into the wind a safe landing. I felt I had a 3 to 5 second delay between the break and taking action. Hard to tell time in an emergency. Turns out the Club has a serious learning curve with this new Tost reel system. The knot in the adapter on the glider end became untied. Look for the "telltale" end of the rope in that adapter. Now I'm calculating one rope break per 1,100 aero tows. Date; 03-26-00. There I was in the back seat, sound familiar? It was Kevin Fleet's turn for a field check. The reel had a malfunction the day before so we were using the conventional Tost release on the tow plane and a brand new, I mean virgin, rope. Our departure was on Runway 27 with a 15 kt headwind with gusts. Sitting rather comfortably at about 350', you know, "POW". This time I feel there was about a 2 to 3 second delay from break to action. Getting better. The rope had releasedfrom the tow plane. I do believe at no fault of the tow pilot. Now with the rope gone, we continued a left turn for an abbreviated left pattern for 27. The kicking tail wind was of great benefit and we had yet another safe landing. We got out to find the rope still attached and in excellent condition. Now calculating one rope break per 733 aero tows. Yeh baby, I feel perky. Moral of the story-it will happen to you. You just don't know when. Be prepared on every flight and think about it constantly until you're at a safe altitude. I feel good about how I and the others reacted to these breaks but am concerned about my mental preparedness. I had been lulled into a false sense of security through years of mostly uneventful tows. I also wish I had been more cognitive of the rope. It was dangling from the glider the whole time. It left my mind, I should have released it over a safe place to prevent possible entanglement with objects on the ground. i.e. trees, gliders, runway lights or anything that would have caused an arrested landing. Be prepared
The Color Green
In our assessment of the Club's financial condition, the directors took existing cash reserves and expected cash flows into account, but did not anticipate two things: (1) the large maintenance bill for the Pawnee as a result of John Muia's very thorough annual inspection, and (2) the relatively slow accretion of member dues payments. In the first instance, I believe that everyone is in agreement that the safe condition of the Pawnee is paramount, and the amount expended to meet John's very careful approach to maintenance is money well spent. There's really nothing more to be done in this case. In the second instance, I want to plead to those members who have not yet paid their dues to please do so as soon as possible. I know that invoices went out a bit later than usual this year, but all of us knew they were coming and there really is no excuse for waiting so long after being invoiced to pony up. We actually have (barely) enough money in our accounts to make the charter loan payoffs, but this would leave the Club in a very vulnerable position if an unexpected maintenance action or other financial obligation were to hit. We are hopeful that the combination of member dues payments and normal Club operating revenues will quickly fill the coffers to a safe level. When that happens, we will make the charter loan payoffs at greatest possible speed. The current projections put this at occurring in late April or early May, but again I must stress the need for member dues payments and good operating revenues between now and then. Thank you for your incredible patience, and please accept my
word that these payments will be made as soon as can be done in a
responsible manner..
"There was wave in them thar hills"...
Like a fine jewel, this Camp shows a different facet to every pilot who participates. Take a peek through the eyes of some of the participants: My husband convinced me to join him at the wave camp in Petersburg for a long weekend. Flying trips aren't always a vacation. Fred (Bane) and his father Don made this trip an exception. Being 8 months pregnant and having three boys to watch, 34, 6 and a 2 yr old; flying trips can be exhausting. The facilities however, were first rate, it was similar to last year's trip to Caesar Creek's great clubhouse. They had an actual living room with real furniture, TV, VCR, radio, tables, coloring books, and plenty of fantastic hospitality. The weather was nice and the facility was very clean, even the kitchen. -Charmaine Bradley We packed the car the night before, woke up at 3:30 am, grabbed a quick breakfast, and headed out at 4:15. As the sun rose, lennies were visible in many quadrants. Launches began just after 7, and were followed with reports of strong lift. -George Jr., George III, and Geoff Hazelrigg Friday morning, a personal "Dawn Flight". Lifting off runway 31 the huge shadow of the big Cirrus explodes from behind and under me to race down the runway toward the towplane. What a way to start the day. A couple of hours later, we re-merge with the same shadow on very short final-sort of as if we'd been on our separate journeys. -Jim Kellett, Cirrus N8169 The above items are excerted from a larger group on Jim Kellett's excellent web collection. To enjoy more personal accounts visit the page at http://skylinesoaring.org/MISC/WaveCamp.html
"Current"
1.2.4 If a member has not flown a glider at the current airport of operation within the past three months, he/she must get a check ride with a Skyline instructor before using club equipment. Note: This rule also applies to visiting pilots receiving tows by the club tow plane. In the course of the discussion, it was recognized that the existing wording of the rule is, in some areas, not in tune with the philosophy of the rule. For instance, a strict interpretation of the rule would require that all tow pilots get a field check every 90+ days if they haven't flown a glider-even if they are completely current in the towplane. In addition, if no members have flown at the current field of operation in the past 90 days, there is no way for the first member to fly without breaking the rule. The board agreed that some revisions were necessary, and agreed on an overall philosophy that anyone putting a piece of club equipment-i.e., a club glider or tow plane-at risk should be "current", and that there was a distinction between the skill required to be "current" at piloting an aircraft and the knowledge required to be "current" at a particular field of operation. (I'm putting quotation marks around the term "current" to ensure that the reader does not mistake the club's definition of currency with that of the FARs.) Anyway, the board has decided on the following approach: If a pilot does not meet *both* of the following requirements, that pilot shall receive a field check from a Skyline instructor before flying a Club glider, towing with a Club tow plane, or receiving a tow in any glider from a Club towplane:
Note: These regulations do not relieve the pilot of any responsibilities they have under any applicable FARs. Here are a few simple (I hope) examples: a) Ted Tow pilot flies the Club's Pawnee exclusively. Joe Tow pilot has not flown since his last tow day at FRR in December 1999 and is coming out to tow tomorrow (March 26) at FRR. He must make three takeoffs and landings in an airplane before towing. b) Gus Gliderguider is a member of the Club and flew his glider at FRR in 1999. He also flew three flights at Petersburg in March 2000. He is OK to fly in his glider (or a Club glider, assuming he has been checked out in that glider) tomorrow at FRR. c) Vince Visitor is a member of another Club and trailers his glider to FRR. He has not flown at FRR since 1996, but he flew three flights at Petersburg in March 2000. He wants to take a tow behind the Club's tow plane. Even though he meets the three-takeoffs/landings-in-past-90-days part of the rule, he does not meet the flown-at-field-of-operation-in-past-two-years part of the rule. He must first take a field check flight with a Club instructor. The intent of these rules is to keep our pilots (on either end of the tow rope) sharp and to make sure that they are familiar with the particular nuances of flying at Front Royal (or wherever the Club is operating). We are committed to a safe operation. If any member feels
that any rule is in need of change, please bring this to the
immediate attention of the board at
skyline-directors@www.ssl.umd.edu.
BFRers
You also all know that we are VERY short of instructors-only four right this minute. Accordingly, we would VERY much like to minimize the valuable instructors' time consumed in conducting a good ground instruction portion. Therefore, Joe Parrish has volunteered to host two one-hour BFR ground instruction sessions, the first was on March 26, and the second one will be on Sunday, April 16th at noon in the FRR Terminal building. Brown bag lunch and talk. This is a very good deal. Contact Joe ASAP if you'd like to take advantage of it. You SHOULD have an endorsement from a single CFI that certifies that both the ground and flight instruction of a biennial flight review has been accomplished. If you actually GET both forms of instruction from the same instructor, you're set. If you get the Ground instruction from Joe and the flight instruction from someone else, read on. In addition, I have absolutely no problem in signing such a
certification after I complete the flight portion with any member,
with the knowledge that you have attended one of Joe's ground
instruction sessions. I suspect other instructors will have a similar
opinion, but if you get the ground instruction in a class, you might
want to check in advance with whomever you fly with to make sure it's
OK with him/her. Joe may, at his discretion, make an endorsement in
your logbook regarding the ground instruction, but understand that
such an endorsement is basically "for information only" as far as the
FAA is concerned, at least as I now understand it.
Log this...
|